[Seaside] Seaside not loading css styles (but our fault)

[Mariano Martinez Peck]

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 23 September 2011 11:50, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23 September 2011 11:43, Mariano Martinez Peck <
> marianopeck at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck
> >> > <marianopeck at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> > Any clues of what can be the problem ?
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Likely there is something messed up with the configurations.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> You can reinitialize all code with the following Gofer helper:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>     WADevelopment reinitializePackages: WADevelopment allPackages
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Similarly, you can see if there are any code differences:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>     WADevelopment localPackageChanges: WADevelopment allPackages
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > That's doesn't help, because I am NOT loading seaside with
> >> >>> > Metacello/Gofer/Monticello/MZC. Instead, we are experimenting with
> >> >>> > Fuel
> >> >>> > ;)
> >> >>> > So...I am sure there must be a problem somewhere in our code, but
> I
> >> >>> > cannot
> >> >>> > understand what.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Sure, the two above expressions do not care how the code is loaded.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Are you sure?
> >> >> I have a problem because the monticello packages are not present.
> Check
> >> >> the attached screenshot.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Sorry...PharoDebug.log. And here it is.
> >>
> >> Ahh, maybe you should create at least MCWorkingCopies?
> >>
> >
> > That's being dependent on how the code is loaded ;)
>
> That depends on your definition of "the code is loaded".
>
> I assume that the image/changes file is in *exactly* the same state as
> if the code would be loaded with Monticello.
>
>
Well. Again, if you assume that .image/.changes file is exactly as it would
be with Monticello, then that is not independent of you load the code ;)
In my case I am loading the code without touching .changes and doing nothing
related to Monticello.
Anyway, that's another discussion and I appreciate the help of all this
thread.

Lukas
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> www.lukas-renggli.ch
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>



-- 
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20110923/dcc400c8/attachment-0001.htm