[Seaside] deployment question

Dale Henrichs dhenrich at vmware.com
Thu Apr 4 19:43:43 UTC 2013

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <sven at stfx.eu>
| To: "Seaside - general discussion" <seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
| Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:05:11 AM
| Subject: Re: [Seaside] deployment question
| On 04 Apr 2013, at 18:57, Milan Mimica <milan.mimica at gmail.com> wrote:
| > On 4 April 2013 18:49, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at stfx.eu> wrote:
| > 
| > The next step is load balancing over a couple of Smalltalk images (with
| > sticky sessions aka session affinity).
| > 
| > But then the images would probably have to share data somehow.
| Yes, of course, it all depends on the application.
| He started with simple image based persistence, it would be overkill to move
| If I remember correctly, DabbleDB got away with image based persistence, with
| an image per user, starting it on demand.


DabbleDB got away with "image based persistence", but they invested a fair amount of work in making their version of "image-based persistent" work ... they definitely did not use "simple-image-based persistence" as described by Ramon ... I believe that they leveraged a custom version of image-segments and a few other tricks that were anything but simple...

So in the end I don't really think that you can say "DabbleDB got away with image based persistence" ... 


More information about the seaside mailing list