[Seaside] Re: Bootstrap implementations, pros and cons?

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Thu Feb 20 23:13:32 UTC 2014

On 20.02.2014, at 23:47, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:

> Tobias wrote
> >[2] is aimed at Magritte specifically, which Torsten left out in [3] 
> >for good reasons. 
> [2] actually should work fine without Magritte. The examples are 
> Magritte based though. Torsten decided to do a new implementation
> of a newer version of Twitter Bootstrap, with a similar, but different
> API, instead of migrating [2] to the newer version. 
> Diego and I are rebuilding the Magritte support on top of it, 
> making sure that it doesn't interfere with the base. Torsten decided 
> he doesn't want the Magritte support in the same repository.
> When it works, QCMagritte will use [3] and [4]. We're already pretty
> close, but not everything is working yet.

Thanks for the clarification of my unclearness ;)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1625 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20140221/2a67ce3e/signature.pgp

More information about the seaside mailing list