[GLASS] [Seaside]

[Paul DeBruicker]

Not sure but you're probably safe to use Seaside 3.1.1 in GemStone 3.2 if
you're safe to use anything.  If any porting work for Seaside to GemStone
3.2 has been done or is necessary it hasn't been discussed publicly yet.


See: http://forum.world.st/release-3-1-1-td4759404.html







Dale Henrichs-3 wrote
> Reg,
> 
> I've run the 3.0.9.1 Seaside tests against 3.2 and they passed.
> 
> I also did some work for 3.0.10 and 3.2, but I seem to recall hearing that
> 3.0.10 "shouldn't be used with gemstone", but I can't find the reference
> ... looking at the diffs the Grease version has been updated and a handful
> of packages were updated  ...
> 
> according to #stable it looks like 3.0.12 is supposed to be the latest
> version, but 3.0.10, 3.0.11 and 3.0.12 are all blessed as development, so
> I'm not sure how stable they actually are ... and I didn't port them to
> GemStone 3.2 _because_ they were all blessed as development.
> 
> AFAIK, 3.0.9 is the last version that was "released" and 3.0.9.1 has been
> ported to GemStone 3.2 ...
> 
> Perhaps someone else, can provide better information:)
> 
> Dale
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Reg Krock <

> rkrock3@

> > wrote:
> 
>> Which configuration of seaside should be loaded into Gemstone/S 3.2?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Reg
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside mailing list
>> 

> seaside at .squeakfoundation

>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list

> seaside at .squeakfoundation

> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside





--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/GLASS-Seaside-tp4759761p4759772.html
Sent from the Seaside General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.