<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7651.59">
<TITLE>Re: [Seaside] [ANN] GemStone BOF at Smalltalk Solutions 2007</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>It sounds like its the same model as other vendors use, do whatever you want with it as limits are built-in, just don't try to crack them. The main talk is tomorrow, rest assured I will be there asking as many questions as I can think of and this one is on the list. Anything else anyone wants to find out?<BR>
<BR>
Cheers!<BR>
<BR>
-Boris<BR>
(Sent from a BlackBerry)<BR>
<BR>
----- Original Message -----<BR>
From: seaside-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org <seaside-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org><BR>
To: Seaside - general discussion <seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org><BR>
Sent: Tue May 01 21:33:05 2007<BR>
Subject: Re: [Seaside] [ANN] GemStone BOF at Smalltalk Solutions 2007<BR>
<BR>
On 5/1/07, Boris Popov <boris@deepcovelabs.com> wrote:<BR>
><BR>
> Its just a number of gems serving pages, web clients are limited only by<BR>
> what each gem can handle. Are you thinking of running 100,000 copies of<BR>
> GemStone, one per app? :)<BR>
<BR>
Shhh, don't scare them :)<BR>
<BR>
Though I'm definitely curious if that's an option: it would be great<BR>
if seasidehosting.st, for example, could offer an unlimited number of<BR>
independent GemStone Web Edition servers for free.<BR>
<BR>
Avi<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
Seaside mailing list<BR>
Seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org<BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside</A><BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>