<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
One reason I tend to prefer pre-built images is under the assumption
that it would be one of the more stable versions (otherwise why
prebuild it?). For a real production site, stability is paramount.<br>
<br>
Of course, this assumption is also based on the assumption that the
person doing the prebuilding is very deeply involved in Squeak/Seaside,
at least enough so that their opinions on how to build a stable
Squeak/Seaside are reasonably good.<br>
<br>
Nevin<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAx5oTyKKcHEiH5jLobrYqEMKAAAAQAAAAT%2F8LruV2Xki6yVvYMh5H1wEAAAAA@seaswork.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Nevin,
I don't like pre built images too much. I build my own every time I
need customizing a stable release of a Squeak image with an installer script
that loads exactly what I ask for. Currently I'm using 3.9 and Seaside
2.7a1-mb.205 well so far.
cheers,
Sebastian
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-----Mensaje original-----
De: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:seaside-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org">seaside-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:seaside-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org">mailto:seaside-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a>] En nombre
de Nevin Pratt
Enviado el: Jueves, 10 de Mayo de 2007 14:11
Para: Seaside - general discussion
Asunto: Re: [Seaside] Which version should I be using? :)
Brian Brown wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hey all!
Currently I'm using Seaside2.7a1-mb.215, but I see lot's of
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">fixes in
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Magritte and Scriptaculous... many relating to 2.8. Is 2.8 ready to
use? And also, what is the 2.7b1?
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Brian
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">To follow up with Brian's request:
Note that GemStone ported version 2.6. So, if you are
planning on using GemStone/Seaside, I would think you
probably should use 2.6.
And, I would think an already built Squeak image would be
best, like what is found on <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.seaside.st">http://www.seaside.st</a>
That being said, my own "guess" as to the proper image would
be the 'seaside-2.6.zip' package found at:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.seaside.st/Download/Images/">http://www.seaside.st/Download/Images/</a>
But, I would be very interested in hearing other folk's
opinions, also.
Nevin
_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org">Seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org">Seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>