I'm going with 2.8 then...<br>Thanks!<br><br>Esteban<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/22/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Lukas Renggli</b> <<a href="mailto:renggli@gmail.com">renggli@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">> > I'm starting a new Seaside project and I wonder how beta is the developing
<br>> > version of it... Is worth start already in 2.8 or is better to wait until a<br>> > more stable version come to us, and then migrate?<br>><br>> Seaside 2.8 is already used in a commercial project if I remember
<br>> correctly. I think it's now stable enough to use it as a start for a<br>> new project. However, I think developing a project on top of Seaside<br>> 2.7 won't cause too much problems when you want to move to
2.8.<br><br>It works well and it gives many advantages (speed, space). I use it in<br>several commercial projects. As Damien said it should be<br>strait-forward to bring an application from 2.7 to 2.8: The only thing<br>really incompatible is the backtracking of objects (unfortunately the
<br>new scheme doesn't make it easy to be backward compatible).<br><br>Lukas<br><br>--<br>Lukas Renggli<br><a href="http://www.lukas-renggli.ch">http://www.lukas-renggli.ch</a><br>_______________________________________________
<br>Seaside mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org">Seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"Querer es suscitar las paradojas"<br>Camus. El míto de Sísifo.