Does this offer performace benefits as such, or is that Apache provides the infrastructure for a scalable configuration?<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/18/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">David Shaffer</b> <<a href="mailto:cdshaffer@acm.org">
cdshaffer@acm.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Richard Eng wrote:<br>> I've seen a couple of blog posts about running Seaside with Apache. I'm a
<br>> little confused, though. Are you supposed to stop WAKom and have Seaside use<br>> Apache instead? I'm not sure how to do this. The instructions don't make it<br>> clear.<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>> Richard
<br>><br>><br>Not typically. You have both apache and Comanche (Squeak) web servers<br>running. You configure apache to proxy requests, usually based on the<br>path or host name, to seaside as needed. There are lots of examples of
<br>this out there:<br><br><a href="http://onsmalltalk.com/programming/smalltalk/running-seaside-apache-and-iis-on-windowsxp/">http://onsmalltalk.com/programming/smalltalk/running-seaside-apache-and-iis-on-windowsxp/</a><br>
<br><a href="http://tekkie.wordpress.com/2006/10/24/configuring-and-managing-seaside/">http://tekkie.wordpress.com/2006/10/24/configuring-and-managing-seaside/</a><br><br><a href="http://liststest.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/2006-February/006841.html">
http://liststest.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/2006-February/006841.html</a><br><br><a href="http://www.motionobj.com/seasidefaq/ServeStaticFilesWithApache">http://www.motionobj.com/seasidefaq/ServeStaticFilesWithApache
</a><br><br>David<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Seaside mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org">Seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside">
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside</a><br></blockquote></div><br>