<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16525" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007>Hi Conrad,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>Hi Michel, I have a couple of questions in regards to Seaside on
VW:
<DIV><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" color=#0000ff size=2></FONT><BR
class=webkit-block-placeholder></DIV>
<DIV>1) How does one port a Seaside application to Gemstone/S VM in
terms of namespaces? I would</DIV>
<DIV> like to use GLASS as my deployment platform but use
VW as the development platform.<SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT
face="Trebuchet MS" color=#0000ff size=2> </FONT></SPAN><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007> </SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007>I'm certainly not the best person to answer your
question, since I have no experience with Gemstone.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>2) When upgrading to SeasideForWebToolkit(2.8a1.466.0,mbany),
does the system load the other </DIV>
<DIV> packages (i.e. Seaside<SPAN
class=872430810-03092007>S</SPAN>criptaculous(2.8a1.216.0,mbany)</DIV>
<DIV>
and SeasideTestingBundle(R1.5.5.0,mbany)?</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2>No</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" color=#0000ff size=2></FONT><BR
class=webkit-block-placeholder></DIV>
<DIV>3) Does the SeasideForSwazoo(2.8a1.466.0 ,mbany) use
Swazoo 2.0?<FONT face="Trebuchet MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007>It is intended to work with Swazoo as shipped on the VW
distribution, i.e. Swazoo 1.0.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007>I just tried it myself with Swazoo 2.0 and could
see that SeasideForSwazoo does not work on top of Swazoo
2.0.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007>While trying it, I could see that supporting Swazoo 2.0
is n</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN class=872430810-03092007>othing trivial, so it
will take its little time before it is
supported.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>4) Is there any advantage to
using SeasideForSwazoo(2.8a1.466.0,mbany) over </DIV>
<DIV> SeasideForWebToolkit(2.8a1.466.0,mbany) in regards to
performance? <SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2> </FONT></SPAN><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007> </SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2>So far my target for Seaside was WebToolkit, because it is
the Cincom supported web environment in VW.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2>I created the Swazoo bindings just to convince myself that
there is no WebToolkit dependency in the port.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2>However, I never compared the performance of the two. I
guess they must be somehow more or less kind of equal.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2>On the other hand, i</FONT></SPAN><SPAN
class=872430810-03092007><FONT><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT
face="Trebuchet MS" color=#0000ff size=2>t appears that Swazoo is the server of
choice for some Seaside users, so there must be some advantage in
Swazoo but I do not remember what the motivations were.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2>I see some contradictions in your questions : you care
about the performance of two VW solutions while your deployment target is
Gemstone. I would better understand if you were querying about the performance
advantage of using Gemstone over VW.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2>HTH</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><SPAN class=872430810-03092007><FONT face="Trebuchet MS"
color=#0000ff size=2>Michel.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></FONT></SPAN> </DIV></BODY></HTML>