That's right, we dont have to throw away scriptaculous. They can coexist. EXT would be a nice addition to Seaside because i dont see many seaside widget, but that's maybe me not doing my research ...<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">
On 10/30/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Conrad Taylor</b> <<a href="mailto:conradwt@gmail.com">conradwt@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi, I have been using Prototype and Scriptaculous for a bit over a year
and pleased with the performance that it gives my applications.
Also, they are considered to be lower level frameworks for building
AJAX applicationn whereis YUI and EXT tend to more widget based.
Furthermore, EXT can be used on top of YUI, JQuery or Prototype.
Thus, it might be a good idea to have adapters for these various
frameworks so that one can easily switch and/or use them.<br><span class="sg">
<br>
-Conrad<br><br></span><div><span class="e" id="q_115f24b5a4dba140_2"><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/30/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Lukas Renggli</b> <<a href="mailto:renggli@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
renggli@gmail.com
</a>
> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">> Lukas> 1. Please check out the Scriptaculous history in Monticello before
<br>> Lukas> making false assertions in public.<br>><br>> I realize that prototype 1.5 fixes some of the problems. It doesn't fix all<br>> of them. I don't think that's a false assertion.<br>
<br>
This is not what I ment, but anyway.<br><br>> Lukas> 2. At the time when <a href="http://script.aculo.us" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">script.aculo.us</a> was picket (June 2005), there was
<br>> Lukas> no other decent JavaScript library around.
<br>><br>> I don't mean to sound like you made the wrong decision at the time. I just<br>> mean that in light of today's YUI availability, you bet on the wrong pony. I<br>> hope to correct that by helping to create a complete YUI interface instead.
<br><br>You are comparing apples and oranges. YUI is mostly a widget library,<br>while Prototype is a framework to assist AJAX application development.<br><br>As of today I would indeed choose a different library. However I am
<br>certain that Prototype is a far better choice than YUI for what it<br>does. I don't need ready made JavaScript widgets, I want lightweight<br>tools to have more control over the client side. YUI is bloated and<br>
overly complex. It hardly matches the model of stateful components in<br>Seaside.<br><br>Cheers,<br>Lukas<br><br>--<br>Lukas Renggli<br><a href="http://www.lukas-renggli.ch" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch</a><br>_______________________________________________
<br>seaside mailing list<br><a href="mailto:seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>
</span></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>seaside mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org">seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org
</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside" target="_blank">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>