<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Georgia">So, are alternate styles better supported on
the server side or the client? From the perspective of "selling"
Seaside, is it better to say "Here is how Seaside can make this
happen?" or is it better to </font>say "Switch to Firefox and
load this addon?"<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Bob<br>
<br>
On 2/23/11 10:56 AM, Nick Ager wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTi=JWusghLSj2ebGA3NPCjqVCPDhNG2E0D3OL71o@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Bob,
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">What if the alternate stylesheets were configurable by users from their
browsers, but stored on seaside.st? I could clone your stylesheet and switch
all the fonts to Georgia. Then other users could decide to use BorisStyle or
BobStyle or implement their own, either based on one of ours or starting
from scratch. Seaside.st could track which style was most popular and make
that the default for new viewers (or not). The primary site admin would only
need to provide one functioning stylesheet, so no additional work for him.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
With Grease Monkey -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/greasemonkey/">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/greasemonkey/</a> -
BobStyle can rule on Bob's computer. You can even share your own
custom style on <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://userscripts.org/">http://userscripts.org/</a>
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org">seaside@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>