[SoC] Voting policy

[stephane ducasse]

I'm sorry but I will not follow this policy. I do not understand why I  
put -1 to a student
because he would already know Squeak. But do not answer we do not need  
to get a consensus
on that.

Stef

On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Matthew Fulmer wrote:

> Now that the voting period has begun, I think we should create a
> few voting policies. I voted and commented on every application,
> so you can use what I did as an example. Here are the rough
> guidelines I tried to follow:
>
> - I voted on every project with an interested mentor
> - I gave between +4 and -1 for enthusiasm
> - I gave between +4 and 1 for project benefit to squeak (a project can
>  never have non-positive utility)
> - I gave between 0 and -3 for misc deductions, such as:
>  - The project is too big: -2
>  - The project is not described well enough, or too research-y:
>    -1
>  - The student is overqualified: -1 or -2
>
> Overall, my cumulative votes fell between +6 and -1.
>
> -- 
> Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/
> _______________________________________________
> SoC mailing list
> SoC at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/soc
>