nil or #nil?
daanth at unx.sas.com
Tue Aug 25 19:25:49 UTC 1998
Dwight Hughes wrote:
> David N. Smith wrote:
> > I agree that self is not a literal, but I'm not so sure about nil, true,
> > and false.
> > So, what is a literal anyway?
> In this light, nil, true, and false are literals - but so are #nil,
> #true, and #false -- the problem right now is that nil ~~ #nil, true ~~
> #true, and false ~~ #false, which is a bit counterintuitive. Would it
> outrage anyone to consider nil, true and false to be syntactic sugar for
> #nil, #true, and #false?
> -- Dwight
You bet people would be outraged.
Mainly because of a simple fact: #nil, #true, and #false are instances
nil is an instance of UndefinedObject; true is of True and false of
How can a symbol be == to an undefinedObject or a boolean? It cannot.
That's just not object oriented :) :)
Dana Lynne Goldblatt Anthony
Internet Publications Technology at SAS Institute
World Headquarters Cary, NC, USA
More information about the Squeak-dev