I think adding a "squeak-help" list would be a very good thing, but this
is the only one I would want added for now. The highly integrated design
of Squeak means that changes in one part often effect others -- everyone
that is doing anything deep in the system needs to be aware of what
others are doing. Might I also suggest that the squeak-help list use a
[sqh] subject prefix so those subscribed to both squeak and squeak-help
can sort them out more easily (the Pluggable Web Server list uses
[pws]).

-- Dwight

Ryan Davis wrote:
> 
> >I have the feeling this list is not ment for peple like me.
> >
> >Do anyone know of or maybe run a list that still cover Squeak but is less
> >technical than this list?
> 
> I agree that having multiple levels of lists, with varying levels/purposes,
> can be very beneficial. Especially if those lists have a very defined
> purpose/goal. I can envision one as a plain q&a (w/ faq), one as an
> advanced list (this one), one for exploring the new things in squeak that
> aren't present in squeak's kin (e.g. morphic), and possibly others....
> 
>            Ryan Davis         -=-    Zen Spider Software
>  -=- mailto:zss at ZenSpider.com -=- http://www.ZenSpider.com/ -=-
> I know that you believe you understand what you think I said but,
> I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.