subsumption project

Jerome Garcia Jerome.Garcia at wj.com
Wed Oct 28 21:20:16 UTC 1998


     > My job these days involves working on an embedded Java project in a 
     VxWorks environment (see http://www.audesi.com) ... has there been any 
     work towards a headless, embedded real-time Squeak?  This is another 
     project that would be interesting to pursue.
     >
     
     Does your planning also include formalization of a "Smalltalkish" 
     mechanism for communication and syncronization between various 
     headless embedded images on distributed hardware? I am anxious to see 
     the evolution of an easier way doing development in this area.
     
     Also, have you given any thought to the development of automatic 
     generation of simulators for embedded software? I am wondering is 
     whether it is possible to develop a mechanism which would enable a 
     component to generate and return a simulator description in answer to 
     a message like component>>simulator. It can sometimes be a bit of a 
     pain to develop simulators and they tend to get out of date if not 
     constantly watched.
     
     Jerome
     
     --
     
     Jerome E. Garcia
     jegarcia at adventurousmind.com


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: subsumption project
Author:  Dave Astels <astels at audesi.com> at INTERNET
Date:    10/28/98 8:24 PM


Dwight Hughes wrote:
     
> Are you planning on keeping Brooks' exact same Behavior Language LISPy
> syntax and implementation or do you plan to create a new Smalltalk-based 
> Behavior Language?
     
It will be a new Behaviour language that is Smalltalk based rather than LISP 
based.  The tools will follow the same "style" as the standard Smalltalk 
development environment.
     
> If you were to create a SVM that ran a subset of
> Squeak, this could be a very exciting thing for a lot of folks (not so 
> much the subsumption architecture per se but the frameworks and
> mechanisms for generating the embeddable VM).
     
I'm not sure how much of a Squeak subset will be required/desired/included 
but I am planning on using as much of a Smalltalkish syntax as possible.
     
My job these days involves working on an embedded Java project in a VxWorks 
environment (see http://www.audesi.com) ... has there been any work towards 
a headless, embedded real-time Squeak?  This is another project that would 
be interesting to pursue.
     
Dave
     
--
Dave Astels                     The people who are crazy enough 
Software Engineer               to think they can change the world, 
AudeSi Technologies Inc.        are the ones who do. 
astels at audesi.com (work) 01490312 at 3web.net (home)
     
     





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list