Clearly the better view.  Regrettably, legal will probably demur in view of the likelihood of confusion issue and a small, but litigious, three-letter-name company.

Personally, I think each and every version should be renamed "fred," just so we can all remember the name of the current version, and so that Ted needn't have to update <http://www.squeak.org> after each new rev.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MIME :rowledge at interval.com > Sent: Friday, July 16, 1999 12:54 PM
> To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: System Name (was: Re: [UPDATES] Test Pilots only)
> > > <grump>
> I don't mind too much what any version naming convention > might be, but I'd
> quite like to rename Squeak to Jaffa. Then when pea-brain VPs > etc tell me
> they're experts about how to do software and want me to use 'something
> better than that smalltalk stuff' I can mumble and say "ok, I'll use
> jaffa". I'll be happy, they won't know the difference.
> </grump>
> > -- Useful random insult:- Afraid she'll void her warranty if > she thinks too much.
> Tim Rowledge:  rowledge at interval.com (w)  +1 (650) 842-6110 (w)
>  tim at sumeru.stanford.edu (h)  <http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim>
> > > >