Hi,

Andreas Raab wrote:
> Interesting side note: I just downloaded Jun301, installed
> and run it.  It seems that it lost the hardware
> accelleration from the previous versions.  I don't really
> know why but this is strange. Anyone out there who can
> confirm that?!

  I didn't find noticable slowdown.  Jun 301 seems to work
almost as fast as 234 for me.  I use it on VWNC 3.0, Windows
95, Diamond Viper V330, PII 300 enviroment.

  I happened to make a contact with Aoki-san yesterday by
email and he said that Jun 301 is slightly slower than the
previous version because of the support of multi-platform in
his email.

> All the examples (in particular the room example) are
> waaaayyyy slower than they should be ... the only reason to explain this
> would be missing HW accelleration but all other GL stuff (including my own)
> runs really nicely.

  The room example is also as slow as the previous version
for me:-) (3-5 frames (?) per sec when rotating the
viewpoint)

  BTW, I agree that it might and it should run much faster.
Even the benzene example which has only 72 * 12 (= 864)
polygons hardly follows the user interactions. (around 10
frames per sec when rotating.  Who knows where the time
goes?)

                                             OHSHIMA Yoshiki
                Dept. of Mathematical and Computing Sciences
                               Tokyo Institute of Technology