Craig and Paul,

Thanks for the replies.
        "Smalltalk forgetDoIts"
fixed the problem - the changeset that I filed in after the
exceptions package must have had some 'cruft'.
I should mention that all the exception tests on filing in ran
perfectly - that was never a problem...

My code is running correctly with standard
semaphores at present, but I prefer the
safety of valueEnsuring: [self signal] for
the critical block in Semaphore.

Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Latta <Craig.Latta at NetJam.ORG>
To: Peter Smet <peter.smet at flinders.edu.au>
Cc: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu <squeak at cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: Monday, June 14, 1999 7:08 PM
Subject: re: Exceptions - error?


>
>> Using the 1g2 version of the exceptions package,
>> filed into 2.4b image, I had a problem.
>>
>> [problem involving PostOffice]
>>
>> ...
>
> Hmm. I don't get anything like that when I install exception-handling 1g2
into (unmodified) Squeak 2.4b. It installs itself and runs all its tests
successfully.
>
> Please let me know if you get stuck.
>
>
> thanks,
>
>-C
>
>
>--
>Craig Latta
>composer and computer scientist
>craig.latta at netjam.org
>www.netjam.org
>latta at interval.com
>Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
>
>