How About an InstallSqueak Image?

Andrew C. Greenberg werdna at gate.net
Tue Jun 15 11:19:33 UTC 1999


>: -----Original Message-----
>: From: Russell Allen [mailto:russell.allen at firebirdmedia.com]
>: Sent: 15 juin, 1999 00:40
>: To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
>: Subject: Re: How About an InstallSqueak Image?
>
>[ snip ]
>
>: * it should be packaged as one file, (VM + install image + other
>: files), or
>: at most two files (VM + install image including other files),
>: because every
>: extra file which must be downloaded adds unnecessary complexity.
>
>I would say, one file only. We shouldn't forget how this thread started, by
>the mean of downloading problems. An executable file, for example, would
>automatically download as binary mode. So, I am for the one file (VM +
>install image + other files).

The image files aren't suffering from the download problem -- its the 
source files.





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list