Well, for those we want to filter under notSoElegantFiltering:withWindows:
I use Microsoft Internet Mail (free, see at
http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/). MS Outlook has a better looking and
so forth, but the one I proposed is simple and works better :P. For
filtering, you just have to add a filter for squeak at cs.uiuc.edu (and
squeak-request?) at the "To:" and another at the "Cc:".

				Ian

----------
: De : Peter Crowther <peter.crowther at it-iq.com>
: A : squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
: Objet : RE: Squeak newsgroup ?
: DateÝ: mercredi 17 mars 1999 11:41
: 
: > 	Errrrrrr. Isn't a read-only newsgroup about as useful
: > as read-only memory?
: 
: But marginally better than write-only memory :-).  Yes.
: 
: > I prefer it this way. Maybe we can have a tutorial on how to
: > filter mail with procmail and other common mail packages. . . .
: 
: Not all of us live on UNIX boxes with their elegant filtering --- for
: example, Outlook 97 can't filter mail at all without assistance from
: Exchange, and even Outlook 98 with Exchange doesn't handle From:
properly,
: so you need rules for all the different things people call the Squeak
: mailing list if you want them moved to the correct folder.
: 
: I'm certainly not proposing to remove the mailing list, but a 'pull'
service
: rather than a 'push' service for the list could be a good idea.
: 
: 		- Peter
: 
: P.S. I've just been investigating Exchange, and reckon I know how to make
: the newsgroup read-write without compromising security too much.