[VM] NCM performance report

Alan Lovejoy sourcery at pacbell.net
Fri Mar 26 06:32:16 UTC 1999



Ian Piumarta wrote:

>  Helge,
>
>  > I wonder what a J2-NCM VM could do...
>  [snip]

>  What does cost (a *lot*) is block activation, since I have to go
>  through the maps to find the initial nPC based on the intial vPC
>  stored in the closure.  (For compiled methods this cost is only paid
>  when flushing a context out of the context cache, which happens
>  relatively infrequently.)  My #1 request would therefore be to have
>  block bodies compiled into their own CompiledMethods, separate from
>  the home method.  (Or does NCM do this already???  I've not been
>  following the thread very closely.)

I haven't looked at Tim's NCM implementation yet (Hi, Tim!), butI 
know that the VisualWorks implementation has something called
a CompiledBlock, which shares a common superclass with
CompiledMethod (namely, CompiledCode).   I think this is essentially
what you requested.

Tim and I worked together on a project (that shall remain nameless)
where we modified the Squeak VM in a way very similar to Tim's
current NCM implementation (well, actually Tim and Don Charnley
reworked the VM, and I reworked the CompiledMethod class).
It **is** cleaner and more elegant, and makes CompiledMethods
more easily extensible.

--Alan


Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Alan Lovejoy
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf"

Attachment converted: Anon:vcard.vcf 12 (TEXT/ttxt) (00007A78)





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list