Why so few binary method selectors?

stan at stanheckman.com stan at stanheckman.com
Thu Mar 18 21:53:20 UTC 1999


Ward Cunningham <ward at c2.com> writes:
> Anyway, since I enjoy standing at the top of slippery slopes and looking
> down, let me ask the group a question. If we could have long binary
> method selectors, what would be the first one you would define, and what
> would it do? 

Very boring, I'm sure, but the first change I plan to make once I get
Dan's update is to allow ** in place of raisedTo:. I like "raisedTo"
if it appears only once in a line, but it makes long formulae somewhat
cluttered. 

-- 
Stan





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list