Messaging vs. subroutines -- This is silly
Jarvis, Robert P.
Jarvisb at timken.com
Fri May 21 15:01:00 UTC 1999
I'd say people are uncooperative parallel automata. :-)
Bob Jarvis
The Timken Company
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Klein [SMTP:mklein at alumni.caltech.edu]
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 10:41 AM
> To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: Messaging vs. subroutines -- This is silly
>
> > >A message send is a plymorphic selection, followed by a subroutine call
> > >to the appropriate method.
> >
> > Does this mean that you couldn't have a distributed implementation of
> > Squeak where objects were people, methods were instructions for them to
> > follow, and messages were emails?
> >
> Are people cooperating sequential processes or what?
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|