a first attempt at comparing my networking framework to Squea k's

Stewart MacLean stewart.maclean at nzhis.govt.nz
Tue Nov 9 23:55:51 UTC 1999


Hi Craig,

Your networking framework seems very well thought out, separating out the
various concerns.

I appreciate you're a bit miffed about your exception stuff, but suggest
that this framework would more likely to be accepted if it used the
"standard" exception stuff.

Keep it up!

Stewart

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig Latta [mailto:Craig.Latta at NetJam.ORG]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 3:37 AM
> To: Squeak!
> Cc: recipient.list.not.shown; @cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: a first attempt at comparing my networking framework to
> Squeak's
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> 
> Hi--
> 
> 	That comparison I was talking about it at 
> http://netjam.org/correspondents/advocacy.html. Please let me 
> know if I've made any glaring mistakes. Actually, I'd very 
> much appreciate feedback of any kind, but I'm particularly 
> interested in knowing how convincing it is.
> 
> 
> 	thanks!
> 
> -C
> 
> 
> --
> Craig Latta
> composer and computer scientist
> craig.latta at netjam.org
> www.netjam.org
> latta at interval.com
> Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
> 





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list