a first attempt at comparing my networking framework to Squea
k's
Stewart MacLean
stewart.maclean at nzhis.govt.nz
Tue Nov 9 23:55:51 UTC 1999
Hi Craig,
Your networking framework seems very well thought out, separating out the
various concerns.
I appreciate you're a bit miffed about your exception stuff, but suggest
that this framework would more likely to be accepted if it used the
"standard" exception stuff.
Keep it up!
Stewart
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig Latta [mailto:Craig.Latta at NetJam.ORG]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 3:37 AM
> To: Squeak!
> Cc: recipient.list.not.shown; @cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: a first attempt at comparing my networking framework to
> Squeak's
> Importance: High
>
>
>
> Hi--
>
> That comparison I was talking about it at
> http://netjam.org/correspondents/advocacy.html. Please let me
> know if I've made any glaring mistakes. Actually, I'd very
> much appreciate feedback of any kind, but I'm particularly
> interested in knowing how convincing it is.
>
>
> thanks!
>
> -C
>
>
> --
> Craig Latta
> composer and computer scientist
> craig.latta at netjam.org
> www.netjam.org
> latta at interval.com
> Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|