Performance of algorithms in Squeak
dwighth at ipa.net
Fri Sep 24 17:05:40 UTC 1999
It would also be good for you to give some particulars when you post
enhancements like this -- such as performance comparisons with the
existing method, the order and behavior of your new method, etc.
agree at carltonfields.com wrote:
> This is the place to do it. I suggest posting the changes as a fileOut or change file and entitling the message subject with the prefix [ENH]
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MIME :shecter at darmstadt.gmd.de > Sent: Friday, September 24, 1999 11:10 AM
> > To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> > Subject: Re: Performance of algorithms in Squeak
> > > > > c) implement better ones and evaluate them.
> > > Speaking of this...
> > > I use Squeak as a learning tool for my studies in number theory. I
> > play around, implementing new integer methods. I've also made a more
> > efficient implementation of at least one existing method. Where would
> > I send these changes for possible inclusion in Squeak?
> > > - Robb
> > > > >
More information about the Squeak-dev