Lex Spoon wrote:
> to?  Will there ever be an exception which just fills in some default
> value if there isn't a handler?

I posted an UnhandledException implementation to the list a while ago,
although I'm not quite sure if it's what you are looking for.

Michael

-- 
 "To improve is to change, to be perfect is to change often." 
                                            Winston Churchill
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Michael Rueger    m.rueger at acm.org      ++1 (310) 937 7196 |
+------------------------------------------------------------+