ifNil, ifNotNil
Eric Arseneau
eat at huv.com
Thu Aug 3 19:28:09 UTC 2000
> > I, too, years ago implemented ifNotNil: with an optional argument.
> >
> > For Squeak, I happily use ifNotNilDo:. It is not as generic,
> but it saves
> > an argument count test. Now if only it were transformed, too...
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> I will work on the transform now. The transform will get rid of the need
> for testing for 0 vs 1 arguments.
>
> I am assuming that no one will mind and sees no problems with this ???
I just looked at some of the code. It gets kind of hairy in there. I'm not
willing to make these changes unless I have a more recent image and I think
I'm in a 2.8. So I will wait till I have some bigger cohonas ;->
For now I'll just do a search and replace and use ifNotNilDo:
Chickened out ...
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|