How about Smalltalk-2000?

Stefan Matthias Aust sma at 3plus4.de
Sat Feb 19 12:59:05 UTC 2000


At 19:19 17.02.00 +0000, Hans-Martin Mosner wrote:

>Although I really don't need a different Smalltalk syntax, this is a nice
>homework example on how you can make the system suit your needs.

Cool!  I'd really like to try out this change for []-collection access as 
well as Warrens other suggestions for (in IHHO) more readable control flow 
language.  That change should be simple to do although it makes it 
impossible to use "repeat, for, while, if, and switch" as local or instance 
variables... not that is would have been very likely but it adds to the 
number of reserved words (self, super, nil, true, false, thisContext).


bye
--
Stefan Matthias Aust  //  ...dancing on the Darkside of the Moon





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list