Of source code lost in eternity
Stan Heckman
stan at stanheckman.com
Fri Jan 14 22:52:02 UTC 2000
(I think Andre Garzia meant this to go to the list --stan)
On 14 Jan 00, at 13:30, Stan Heckman wrote:
> andregarzia at openlink.com.br writes:
>
> > sorry, i am new to smalltalk
>
> Greetings and be welcome.
Tanx!
>
> > but i like testing alpha softwares,
>
> Then you must already know that alpha software is young, still
> learning how to behave. It may, in its learning process, mistreat
> you. You have been warned. :-)
>
> > how do i upgrade?
>
> This is explained on the Squeak Alpha Testing page of the swiki
> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/982. (Those instructions are for
> upgrading 2.6 to 2.7a, but I suspect you will figure out how to use
> them to upgrade 2.7 to 2.8alpha.) If you don't know how to update yet,
> read the note at the bottom of the download page,
> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/388. If these pages don't make
> sense to you, let us know.
>
Okey i upgraded to 2.8alpha and my computer still working!!!
I have a question/bug report/comment:
i was trying to smalltalk a little when my windows died. i reboot
and restarted Squeak and received a msgbox telling me my gp-
squeak2.8.changes was missing or in the wrong directory, but i
checked and it still there.... so i created a new image and continued
working, everything was fine.
then i intentionaly induced (the word induced exist in english!?)
some GPF in my windows to kill squeak. after repeating the
proccess i noticed that each time you do not correctly close
squeak, the next time you run, it will complaing about missing
the <your image>.changes files.
Does this heapens only with me? Is it a bug or theres some
ReadMe explaining that?
Well i might just be too anxious to spot missing holes...
Ghinea Pigging Forever
Andre Garzia
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|