[ENH][ANSI] Collection>>allSatisfy:
Ivan Tomek
ivan.tomek at acadiau.ca
Wed Jul 5 15:19:06 UTC 2000
'Standard' is probably too strong a word. 'Guidelines' or
'Recommended form/practice' might be better. And I don't think that it
is impossible to have an informal agreement.
I would see this as a desirable development. Consider method
comments, for example. They can be automatically extracted for
documentation or queries and if they all had similar format and
content, you could rely on them to provide complete, meaningful and
useful easy-to-read information. By the way, if the Smalltalk
community agreed on a standard XML format for source code, and if
this included method comments, they could be extracted even more
easily.
References:
S. Skublics, et al.: Smalltalk with style, Prentice-Hall, 1966.
K. Beck: Smalltalk best practices and patterns, Prentice-Hall, 1997.
Ivan
<Jarvis>
> > Let me make a small suggestion: Could the community agree on some
> > standard form of commenting methods?
>
> Probably not. I don't mean to say this would be a bad thing, but
> trying to get a group of iconoclastic individualists to agree on some
> form of regimentation is, I fear, unlikely to meet with much in the
> way of success. Put another way, we can probably reach agreement on
> this as soon as we can develop a consensus on a single set of
> brace-and-indenting rules.
>
> Bob Jarvis
> Compuware @ Timken
>
Ivan Tomek,
Jodrey School of Computer Science
Acadia University
Nova Scotia, Canada
fax: (902) 585-1067
voice: (902) 585-1467
e-mail: ivan.tomek at acadiau.ca
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|