>>"Andrew P. Black" <apb at cse.ogi.edu> wrote...
>>>Is there a 68k version of the Squeak VM?  Or would it be too slow 
>>>to be useful?
>>
>>The one I posted on May 26 to the 2.8 folder at UIUC
>>(SqueakVM2.8beta.sea.bin) should run fine on the 68K.
>
>Ah, thanks, Dan.  I didn't looks at 2.8, only at 2.7.  (I'm not 
>really a test pilot).
>Should my 2.7 images run OK on 2.8?

Yes, it should.  Much credit to Andreas for keeping it so through all the changes.

	- Dan