[BUG] vmTable:at:
Bob Arning
arning at charm.net
Thu Jun 1 20:51:33 UTC 2000
On Thu, 01 Jun 2000 14:41:48 +0200 Stefan Matthias Aust <sma at 3plus4.de> wrote:
>Can be remove vmTable:at:, yes? It's identical to vmParameterAt: and has
>no sender. I just ask because perhaps somebody relays on this method.
Stefan,
While the comment may seem similar to that in #vmParameterAt:, it's just plain wrong. Primitive 254 does different things depending on the number of arguments, so #vmTable:at: actually provides functionality identical to #vmParameterAt:put:.
Cheers,
Bob
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|