At 19:53 15.06.00 +0200, Henrik Gedenryd wrote:

>... or that the "new category" menu selects its available choices poorly. It
>might, for instance, present all existing method categories in all the
>classes in the same system category (of classes). And there might be a
>standardized list of categories somewhere that is always available. And it
>may look in subclasses as well as superclasses.
>
>And to classify an "as yet unclassified" method, you might be presented also
>a choice of the categories in which this selector has been placed elsewhere.

Yes, this dialog should be improved.  Sometimes, the list is much too 
short, then it's too long.  Then, I often do it this way:  I select 
"--all--" and start adding methods.  These methods get categorized as "as 
yet..".  Then I choose rename... to given them a useful name and then 
continue adding to "all".  This omits that long "new category.." menu which 
always shows only categories I don't want and so I need three clicks to 
eventually add something.  To sumarize, when renaming, it would be nice if 
there's a kind of drop-down-combox box which always shows the most typical 
names like "accessing", "testing", etc.

>Nice optimization essay btw!

Thanks (perhaps that's something suitable for squeakworld?)

bye