Stefan Matthias Aust wrote:
> 
> At 19:58 15.06.00 +0200, Henrik Gedenryd wrote:
> 
> >_Now_ you know why I had some misgivings about Squeakworld, as yet another
> >Squeak-related site that will increase the _entropy_ of the Squeak universe,
> >in addition to the total mass as is the intention.
> >
> >Oh, and try Andreas Raab's website. Or look in the mail archives. Or--eh,
> >you get the idea.
> 
> Well, so the obvious answer should be, look always on www.squeakworld.com ;-)
> 
> I don't believe in self-organizing systems like a swiki.  If somebody feels
> responsible, it works.  If not, chaos rules.  If OTOH, somebody is always
> responsible to keep this kind of information up-to-date, collecting and
> structuring information like this, there's a chance that it works.
> 
> Of course one could do this for any web address you want but perhaps a
> fresh start helps here.  And as Tim (I think) wrote, there're always
> hyperlinks.
> 
> bye
> Stefan Matthias Aust // Pilgrims, beware of the Dark between the Fading Stars

I have to agree with Stefan, that a fresh start can help. The criteria for
a webpage in my opinion is something like this: good content, well indexed, 
well maintained. And then the look and feel etc.  The swiki is not up to 
par on at least two points here. I like it for what it is, but it's a bad choise
for reference and uniformity etc. in contrast to what I hope squeakworld will
be. And as far as I can see, the more sites to choose from the better the chance 
is that there is a alternative for just you. :-)

Karl