Georg Gollmann wrote:
> 
> At 8:16 Uhr -0400 26.06.2000, douglas at winetech.com wrote:
> >3. No database ( We currently have about 50,000 records across two
> >databases, taking up about 100 megabytes).  We need fast access from
> >a variety of different indexes.
> >4. Not even an obvious ability to store 100 megabytes on BTrieve-like files.
> 
> If your dataset is so small simply put everything into the image. Why
> mess around with external files if Squeak can handle 4 GB ?

I'd assume that Douglas might be concerned with things like security,
sharability and so on. Why not take a look at MinneStore? Didn't that
appear to be promising?

tim