From: Stefan Matthias Aust <sma at 3plus4.de>
> Yes, one persistent image process would serve all requests.

I'm concerned that one image may not be able to handle all the requests at
the same time due to Squeak not having real OS level threads. Also having
multiple copies provides redundancy and lets you have the images on
seperate machines if desired. As such I'd still prefer to have 10+ copies
of squeak running. FastCgi supports this.

Peter