Display Update Speed - on a *really* slow machine!
Dean_Swan at Mitel.COM
Dean_Swan at Mitel.COM
Wed Mar 22 17:48:42 UTC 2000
From: Dean Swan at MITEL on 03/22/2000 12:48 PM
>It would be interesting to hear how other platforms handle this.
>
> [ Display forceToScreen: (1 at 1 extent: Display extent) ] timeToRun
>
486DX2/50, Win95, Western Digital Display
(i.e. IBM ThinkPad 755C), Driver V4.0
Squeak 2.7 VM & image for 640x480x8 bpp,
with Squeak set to 8 bpp.
Returns anywhere from 116ms to 133ms.
-Dean Swan
dean_swan at mitel.com
P.S. For the curious - '0 tinyBenchmarks' on the same setup returns:
1408450 bytecodes/s; 68431 sends/s
1514004 bytecodes/s; 67750 sends/s
1537279 bytecodes/s; 67808 sends/s
With reduce CPU usage ON - 43ms to 52ms / frame in Morphic Project with 1
FrameRateMorph
With reduce CPU usage OFF - 22ms to 29ms / frame in Morphic Project with 1
FrameRateMorph
World menu Open -> Browser Takes about 11 seconds for browser to appear after
clicking.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|