Safe pattern for creating new root classes
dpennell at quallaby.com
dpennell at quallaby.com
Sat Mar 25 01:00:59 UTC 2000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lex Spoon [mailto:lex at cc.gatech.edu]
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 12:20 PM
> To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: RE: Safe pattern for creating new root classes
>
[snip]
> >
> > Or we could dynamically load the superclass...
> >
>
>
> Where would you load it from? The problem is when you say:
>
> A subclass: B
>
> and A doesn't exist (yet). Currently, B ends up as a new root class,
> which probably wasn't intended. It's especially problematic because
> loading a future version of A, will not correct B's definition.
If we had dynamically loaded classes, like a certain other language,
we would first try to load A. I'm assuming that this might tie into
some of the work that SqC is in the middle of.
-david
PS - Is my mail reader sending out MIME again? I got a new machine
yesterday with Outlook 2000 and I have been through every menu I can
find and it looks like its supposed to be sending plain text. The
Format menu on this message claims that I'm in plain text.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20000324/32591b8c/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|