On Sun, 5 Mar 2000 14:32:50 "Lex Spoon" <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
>Below is an attempt to fix it.  The spawnNewProcessIfNeeded is now given
>a parameter, which is the process which just got axed.  However, I'm not
>completely sure if activeProcess is exactly what I think it is....
>

Looks good to me.

Cheers,
Bob