[ENH] Assertion
Lex Spoon
lex at cc.gatech.edu
Thu May 25 18:50:29 UTC 2000
Stephan Rudlof <sr at evolgo.de> wrote:
> > self failIf: [a > 0]
> > self failIf: [a > 0] with: 'illegal value for a'
> >
Adding an explanation is a great idea. However, how about using a more
meaningful word than a generic "with" or "that". For instance:
self assert: [ x <= 0 ] explanation: 'x should be positive'
-Lex
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|