=> 5/30/00 1:57:19 PM EDT, sr at evolgo.de =>
<< I think I have found a possible location of the problem. There is a subtle 
difference in the semantics with or without the LargeIntegers module.>>

With the detailed comments of values at the time of failure in my last 
E-mail, I have to admit I am at my limit with knowledge of complex (sic) 
arithmetic. I have done CRC algorithms and played around with Signature 
stuff, and I know how long it takes to acquire an understanding of what is 
actually going on inside of one of these things (and I know that I don't have 
that much understanding of this situation).
 
<>

Since you are not in a position to run DSA, and I am not in a position to 
create the right 'testus agonistus', can I offer myself up as a tester. 
Please let me know what tests and result content and formats you want, and 
I'll try to get them to you. 

I suppose we should take this off-line from the mailing list with all these 
(massive) cryptic numeric results. I would like to drag in whoever is 
responsible for DSA code (is it John Maloney?) for the knowledge that s/he 
may provide, and also ask Bob Arning if he is interested in participating in 
tracking this down? 

DSA programmer? 
Bob? 
Anyone else?

Cheers,
Jerry.
____________________________

Jerry L. Archibald
systemObjectivesIncorporated
____________________________

"Knowledge is something that you can use,
 Belief is something that uses you."
    Idries Shah