Andres Valloud <avalloud at exobox.com> wrote:
> Let's consider this scenario too. Suppose you have a dirty buffer from 0 to
> 100. Then you set the position 200 and send nextPutAll:. So you shouldn't
> flush.
> 

It's unlikely that someone is going to position: back to spot 100 and
start increasing the buffer again.  So, most implementations would just
do a flush whenever position: is called, anyway....


-Lex