where are the latest Linux VMs being kept these days?

Mark A. Schwenk mas at wellthot.com
Sat May 6 11:44:51 UTC 2000


Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Tim Rowledge wrote:
> 
> > Subject line just about says it all. There seems to have been a bunch of
> > people doing 'stuff' to the linx VM code recently and I'm curious as to
> > where it is ending up. Ian seems to have been busy for some time and I
> > had the impression Bruce has been keeping stuff up to date?
> 
> Hi Tim!
> 
> Did you just send this mail? The date indicates otherwise, but it was
> marked "new" in my folder ...
> 
> Up to now, there's noone except Ian issuing new VMs. I am currently
> merging your and Dave's XWindow changes with my Netscape plugin stuff,
> so I guess I have the latest sources. I was occupied last week but I hope
> I'll finish it in a couple of days.

Great! I'm looking forward to seeing your merged VM.

> 
> Maybe it's time to create a mechanism for merging fixes between the
> official releases? Like a central CVS for the Unix squeak port?

How about setting up a sourceforge.net project?

Several of the Camp Smalltalk projects are using this.

> 
> BTW, how do you all feel about adding a "-secure" option to the VM which
> would enable the file sandbox even if not run as plugin? Lately, there are
> .morphs and other stuff sent around which could do much harm to anyone's
> disk. And most of the time I'm only working with files in Squeak's image
> directory anyway.

This sounds helpful.

> 
> -- Bert

-Mark Schwenk
 WellThot Inc.





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list