Helge Horch wrote:
> 
> At 21:54 30.10.2000 +0100, Karl Ramberg wrote:
> >Delay forMilliseconds: 300.
> 
> Side note: Keep in mind that that's a rather short delay.  I guess that in
> your real code, there's a "(...) wait" around it.

You mean that's not a reliable way to make a 10 usec delay?

Sad...

-- 
Ned Konz
currently: Stanwood, WA
email:     ned at bike-nomad.com
homepage:  http://bike-nomad.com