Q for Celeste users

Lex Spoon lex at cc.gatech.edu
Tue Sep 19 19:43:33 UTC 2000


Bob Arning <arning at charm.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:28:56 -400 "Lex Spoon" <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> >So I'm guessing there is some application of Celeste that we're wanting
> >to use here?  For example, the ability to email a Squeak page to
> >someone?!  For such applications, it seems perfectly appropriate to use
> >plugin-specific EMAIL.xxx files.
> 
> 
> That's right. However, the selection of email file names is an image
> decision and I'm currently using the same image in both browser and non-browser modes. 


Still:

	a) Why insist on having the same image for the plugin and for hacking?

	b) Why use Celeste, instead of using SMTPSocket directly?  Why store
email messages on disk from a plugin?



-Lex





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list