Q for Celeste users
Lex Spoon
lex at cc.gatech.edu
Tue Sep 19 19:43:33 UTC 2000
Bob Arning <arning at charm.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:28:56 -400 "Lex Spoon" <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> >So I'm guessing there is some application of Celeste that we're wanting
> >to use here? For example, the ability to email a Squeak page to
> >someone?! For such applications, it seems perfectly appropriate to use
> >plugin-specific EMAIL.xxx files.
>
>
> That's right. However, the selection of email file names is an image
> decision and I'm currently using the same image in both browser and non-browser modes.
Still:
a) Why insist on having the same image for the plugin and for hacking?
b) Why use Celeste, instead of using SMTPSocket directly? Why store
email messages on disk from a plugin?
-Lex
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|