Yes, this is the way I was planning to play (er... I mean 
experiment) with it.

Thanks,
Joshua

On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 10:21:21AM -0700, Dan Ingalls wrote:
> While Morphic may not be designed specifically for embedded semantic information, it's really easy to experiment with this using the
> 	setProperty: #propertyName toValue: value
> 	valueOfProperty: #propName
> protocol (Morph>access properties).  I would think this would be adequate for playing around.  If you get serious, then you'll probably want to develop a whole semantic network formalism, and just use morphic as a viewer for that.
> 
> 	- Dan