ConnectorMorph, Mind-Mapping and Concept-Mapping
Joshua Channing Gargus
schwa at cc.gatech.edu
Sat Sep 30 18:05:38 UTC 2000
Yes, this is the way I was planning to play (er... I mean
experiment) with it.
Thanks,
Joshua
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 10:21:21AM -0700, Dan Ingalls wrote:
> While Morphic may not be designed specifically for embedded semantic information, it's really easy to experiment with this using the
> setProperty: #propertyName toValue: value
> valueOfProperty: #propName
> protocol (Morph>access properties). I would think this would be adequate for playing around. If you get serious, then you'll probably want to develop a whole semantic network formalism, and just use morphic as a viewer for that.
>
> - Dan
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|