Bisquick??? Frosty Cuddles!!! I'm *terrified*. ;-}>
How about keeping it simple.

    SWTSqueak or SWT-Squeak

That would simply indicate a Squeak world tour base.

John Sarkela


> From: "Robert D. Church" <churchr at ghostbitch.org>
> Reply-To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 08:38:19 -0700
> To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: Pink Squeak (was Re: Stable Squeak?)
> Resent-From: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Resent-Date: 19 Apr 2001 15:38:09 -0000
> 
> How about "Solid Squeak"?
> 
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:41:01AM -0400, Jarvis, Robert P. (Contingent)
> quipped:
>> BizSqueak?  (Sounds a bit like "Bisquick" :-)
>> 
>> Bob Jarvis
>> Compuware @ Timken
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: John M McIntosh [mailto:johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:38 AM
>>> To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> Subject: Re: Pink Squeak (was Re: Stable Squeak?)
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> "Pink Squeak" as the new name for the version of Squeak targeted
>>>> toward business/commercial use?  Hmm, "Squeak" by itself is already
>>>> a bit whimsical sounding, but this might push it a bit too far.  Why
>>>> not go all the way and just call it "Golden Twinkie" or "Frosty
>>>> Cuddles"? :)
>>> 
>>> Business Squeak?
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> --
>>> ==============================================================
>>> =============
>>> John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> 1-800-477-2659
>>> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.
>>> http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
>>> ==============================================================
>>> =============
>>> 
>> 
>