[BUG] 'That name already in use' when filing in updates to 3.1alpha

Bob Arning arning at charm.net
Mon Apr 23 17:49:55 UTC 2001


Dave, et al,

Did you try this?

On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 16:09:56 -0700 "Ted K." <Ted.Kaehler at disney.com> wrote:
>Folks,
>	As Andreas pointed out on April 4th, there is a serious problem
>with update 3880.  Update 3880 in the 3.1 alpha sequence installs a
>SystemVersion class.  This change has serious consequences for updating.
>
>	I have created a fix and modified some files on the update server.
>
>	If you have updated beyond 3880, please execute this doIt:
>
>| existing |
>existing _ ChangeSorter allChangeSetNames.
>existing _ existing collect: [:cngSet | cngSet copyReplaceAll: '/' with: '_'].
>existing _ existing collect: [:each | each initialIntegerOrNil].
>(existing select: [:each | each notNil]) asSet do: [:each |
>	SystemVersion current registerUpdate: each]
>
>	Then, you may ask for updates as usual.
>
>
>	If you are not up to 3880 yet, you will encounter my fix when you
>update.  After update 3880, you will be asked to dismiss a Halt window.
>When you have done that, you may ask for updates again.  All should be well
>after that.


Cheers,
Bob

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:27:23 -0400 "David N. Smith" <dnsmith at watson.ibm.com> wrote:
>At 12:48 -0400 4/19/01, Daniel V. Oppenheim wrote:
>>I built a 3.1alpha image today. Got to change # 3892. Then, when I did a 'load code updates' I got 18 times the notifier: 'this name is already used'. Looks like the new change sets were using duplicate names of the old sets I just filed in. After this happened I am at #3910, and currently there are no new changes.
>>
>>
>>Danny Oppenheim
>>---
>>
>>Dr. Daniel V. Oppenheim
>>	Computer Music Center
>>	IBM T.J. Watson Research Center	     phone: (914) 945-1989
>>	P. O. Box 218 (or Route 134)	     fax:   (914) 945-3434
>>	Yorktown Heights, NY 10598	     www.research.ibm.com/music
>
>Danny:
>
>I just got 4-5 of them at the start of loading the latest changes 3899-3910.
>
>Did you ever get a response to your mail? or is it just IBMers that have the problem?
>
>Dave





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list