I originally tried to provide a different systemOrganizer to the borwser.
However, wehen compiling a new method the current systemOrganizer was not
modified. I browsed a bit around without really finding what I wanted.

Does anybody knows if SystemOrganization is directly?
Apparently I also made a confusion between SystemOrganizer and Smalltalk.

I was wondering why I should work in a different namespace, environment
(Smalltalk) and not in a different SystemOrganizer?

I'm certainly worng but if somebody can say it this would help me.


on 4/25/01 6:27 AM, Les Tyrrell at tyrrell at canis.uiuc.edu wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ned Konz <ned at bike-nomad.com>
> To: <squeak at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 7:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Fog Browser: Limiting or focusing browsers
> 
> 
>> On Tuesday 24 April 2001 15:08, Les Tyrrell wrote:
>>> If the regular Browser were consistent in always asking for "self
>>> environment" or such instead of "Smalltalk", then this would be trivial to
>>> do.
>> 
>> And this is also needed (for instance) for Pocket Smalltalk and other
>> projects that use the standard browsers with considerably different
>> environments.
> 
> Yes- this is how Oasis is able to use VW 3.0's regular Browser, although with
> a few minor
> modifications to it ( an "environment" instance variable had to be added, and
> accessors adjusted
> accordingly- other than that, the rest of the thing was ready to go as it was
> ).  On the other hand,
> pervasive use not only of "Smalltalk" but also an insistence on discarding
> classes given to it in
> favor of retaining only the symbol representing their name, which it would
> then proceed to look up
> in Smalltalk, is why the refactoring tools required tremendous revision to
> work in a similar manner.
> 
>> I believe Eric Arseneau tracked down a number of references to
>> Smalltalk that should have been "self class environment" or similar. However,
>> I don't think these ever got fixed (though he posted them, as I recall).
> 
> If the refactoring tools are running in Squeak, this should only take a few
> moments to do.  Oh,
> wait- I forgot you probably don't have the kind of scoping control that I do.
> I suppose that I
> could bring those browsers into Oasis and do the refactoring there.
> 
> - les
> 
>