PhiHo,

You should use '0 tinyBenchmarks' to get a comparable result (also don't
remove -DDEBUG but replace it with -DNDEBUG). On my (Win98) machine this
gives roughly the same results Marcus sees on Linux:

BI: '56,387,665 bytecodes/sec; 1,719,372 sends/sec'
J3: '65,775,950 bytecodes/sec; 9,073,805 sends/sec'

Oh my dear - what a historic moment (btw, Marcus why are unrunnable settings
the default????) The last SqueakJ.exe I built was in ... let's see ...
November '98 or so... and here we go again ... itsa working ... :-)))

[BTW, for those curious and not afraid of crashes I've uploaded a copy of
the executable to
http://isgwww.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~raab/squeak/alpha/SqueakJ3.zip]

Cheers,
  - Andreas


> -----Original Message-----
> From: phiho.hoang [mailto:phiho.hoang at home.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:18 PM
> To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Cc: recipient list not shown
> Subject: Re: x86 jitter? (One more try!)
> 
> 
> Hi Marcus,
> 
>     Thanks for the info. I could build J3 from Andreas 
> sources together with
> instructions from you and Ian. I just ran a couple bench marks
> (3.1.3898.image + WinME + AMD 1.2 MHz +
> 256 MB):
> 
> (Time millisecondsToRun: [1000 benchmark])
>     Interp:      4320
>     J3:           3645
> 
> (Time millisecondsToRun: [10000 benchmark])
>     Interp:   43127
>     J3:        36770
> 
>     There must be something wrong. This is non-debug (no 
> -DDEBUG). I got
> assertion failed (at compile.cc: 1929) inMeth->includesVPC 
> (endPC + 1),
> though (I just commented it out :-).
> 
>     Cheers,
> 
>     PhiHo
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marcus Denker" <marcus at ira.uka.de>
> To: <squeak at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Cc: <phiho.hoang at home.com>; <ian.piumarta at inria.fr>
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:35 AM
> Subject: Re: x86 jitter? (One more try!)
> 
> 
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:26:33PM -0700, Raab, Andreas wrote:
> > > Hi PhiHo (and anyone else interested),
> > >
> > > I've just uploaded a variant of the Win32 sources to
> > >
> > > 
> http://isgwww.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~raab/squeak/alpha/w32-j3.11.tar.gz
> > >
> > > latest x86 tree from your site. It would be useful if you 
> could run a
> diff
> > > on the two and integrate the modifications in the generic 
> x86 tree.
> There's
> > > also a file COMPILING.win32 in the win32 subdirectory 
> that has a list of
> the
> > > modifications I did].
> > >
> > Ok.
> >
> > > This version compiles out of the box (given that you've 
> got the right
> tools
> > > of course), runs and then dies. But it turns out that with the
> alloca()ed
> > > stack we're getting way further - now we're getting to
> > >
> > > compile.cc: in `void gen_compile()'
> > > compile.cc:1111: phase error at sPC 26: 0084F18D r.d.. 1< 
>  41 0084F1A8
> > > LdTemp 1
> > >
> > This looks good (:-)) ... it seems to be compiled with 
> OPT_FULL, and I
> havn´t
> > yet looked at that... but OPT_MACHINE and OPT_INLINE should work:
> >
> > Please be sure that your #defines are:
> >
> > 1)  optimise.cc
> > #define  OPT_INLINE
> > #undef   OPT_FULL
> >
> > 2)genArray.h
> > #undef INLINED_AT
> >
> > 3)machine.cc
> > #define      INDIRECT_ICACHE false
> >
> >
> >
> >    Marcus
> >
> 
>